Radeon Instinct MI300X vs Quadro 5010M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 192GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI300X and 4GB VRAM Quadro 5010M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon Instinct MI300X 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock2100MHz
More VRAM (192GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (5171GB/s vs 83.20GB/s)
19072 additional rendering cores
Quadro 5010M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (100W vs 750W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon Instinct MI300X
+11726%
81720
Quadro 5010M
691
Graphics Card
Dec 2023
Release Date
Feb 2011
Radeon Instinct
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
2100 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2525 MHz
Memory Clock
650 MHz
Memory
192GB
Memory Size
4GB
HBM3
Memory Type
GDDR5
8192bit
Memory Bus
256bit
5171GB/s
Bandwidth
83.20GB/s
Render Config
304
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
12
19456
Shading Units
384
1216
TMUs
48
0
ROPs
32
1216
Tensor Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
16 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
256 MB
L3 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.80 GPixel/s
2554 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
21.60 GTexel/s
653.7 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
81.72 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
691.2 GFLOPS
81.72 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
750W
TDP
100W
1150 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
Aqua Vanjaram
GPU Name
GF110
-
GPU Variant
N12E-Q5
CDNA 3.0
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
40 nm
153 billion
Transistors
3 billion
1017 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²
Graphics Features
N/A
DirectX
12 (11_0)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.0
N/A
Shader Model
5.1
