Radeon Instinct MI250 vs Tesla K20c
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 128GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI250 and 5GB VRAM Tesla K20c to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon Instinct MI250 's Advantages
Released 9 years late
Boost Clock1700MHz
More VRAM (128GB vs 5GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3277GB/s vs 208.0GB/s)
10816 additional rendering cores
Tesla K20c 's Advantages
Lower TDP (225W vs 500W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon Instinct MI250
+1184%
45260
Tesla K20c
3524
Graphics Card
Nov 2021
Release Date
Nov 2012
Radeon Instinct
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
1700 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1600 MHz
Memory Clock
1300 MHz
Memory
128GB
Memory Size
5GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
8192bit
Memory Bus
320bit
3277GB/s
Bandwidth
208.0GB/s
Render Config
208
Compute Units
-
13312
Shading Units
2496
832
TMUs
208
0
ROPs
40
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
16 MB
L2 Cache
1280 KB
Theoretical Performance
0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
36.71 GPixel/s
1414 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
146.8 GTexel/s
362.1 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
45.26 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.524 TFLOPS
45.26 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1175 GFLOPS
Board Design
500W
TDP
225W
900 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
Aldebaran
GPU Name
GK110
Aldebaran
GPU Variant
GK110-885-KA-A1
CDNA 2.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
58.2 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
Unknown
Die Size
561 mm²
Graphics Features
N/A
DirectX
12 (11_0)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.5
N/A
Shader Model
5.1
