Radeon Graphics 320SP vs Tegra 2 GPU
We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM Radeon Graphics 320SP and 0System Shared VRAM Tegra 2 GPU to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon Graphics 320SP 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 250% (1400MHz vs 400MHz)
320 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (15W vs 20W)
Score
Graphics Card
Jan 2020
Release Date
Jun 2010
Renoir
Generation
Tegra
Integrated
Type
Integrated
IGP
Bus Interface
IGP
Clock Speeds
400 MHz
Base Clock
300 MHz
1400 MHz
Boost Clock
400 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared
Memory
System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent
Render Config
5
Compute Units
-
320
Shading Units
-
20
TMUs
4
8
ROPs
4
Theoretical Performance
11.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.600 GPixel/s
28.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1.600 GTexel/s
1.792 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
896.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
56.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
15W
TDP
20W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
Graphics Processor
Renoir
GPU Name
Tegra 2
-
GPU Variant
T20MGS-SHP-A3
GCN 5.1
Architecture
VLIW Vec4
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
40 nm
9.8 billion
Transistors
Unknown
156 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
ES 2.0
2.1
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
6.4
Shader Model
-
