Radeon Graphics 320SP vs GeForce 320M Mac Edition
We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM Radeon Graphics 320SP and 0System Shared VRAM GeForce 320M Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon Graphics 320SP 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1400MHz
272 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (15W vs 23W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon Graphics 320SP
+884%
896
GeForce 320M Mac Edition
91
Graphics Card
Jan 2020
Release Date
Apr 2010
Renoir
Generation
GeForce 300M
Integrated
Type
Integrated
IGP
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
400 MHz
Base Clock
-
1400 MHz
Boost Clock
-
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared
Memory
System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent
Render Config
5
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
4
320
Shading Units
48
20
TMUs
16
8
ROPs
8
Theoretical Performance
11.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.600 GPixel/s
28.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
7.200 GTexel/s
1.792 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
896.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
91.20 GFLOPS
56.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
15W
TDP
23W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
Graphics Processor
Renoir
GPU Name
C89
-
GPU Variant
MCP89
GCN 5.1
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
-
7 nm
Process Size
40 nm
9.8 billion
Transistors
0.486 billion
156 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
6.4
Shader Model
4.1
