Quadro RTX 8000 vs Quadro K5200
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 48GB VRAM Quadro RTX 8000 and 8GB VRAM Quadro K5200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro RTX 8000 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 130% (1770MHz vs 771MHz)
More VRAM (48GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.0GB/s vs 192.3GB/s)
2304 additional rendering cores
Quadro K5200 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 260W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro RTX 8000
+359%
16310
Quadro K5200
3553
3DMark Time Spy
Quadro RTX 8000
+555%
13586
Quadro K5200
2072
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
Quadro RTX 8000
+630%
6871
Quadro K5200
941
Blender
Quadro RTX 8000
+870%
2844
Quadro K5200
293
Graphics Card
Aug 2018
Release Date
Jul 2014
Quadro
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1395 MHz
Base Clock
667 MHz
1770 MHz
Boost Clock
771 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz
Memory
48GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
672.0GB/s
Bandwidth
192.3GB/s
Render Config
72
SM Count
-
4608
Shading Units
2304
288
TMUs
192
96
ROPs
48
576
Tensor Cores
-
72
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
6 MB
L2 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
169.9 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
37.01 GPixel/s
509.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
148.0 GTexel/s
32.62 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
16.31 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.553 TFLOPS
509.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
148.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
260W
TDP
150W
600 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x USB Type-C
Outputs
2x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
TU102
GPU Name
GK110B
TU102-875-A1
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
18.6 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
754 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
7.5
CUDA
3.5
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
