Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile vs Radeon Instinct MI250X
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile and 128GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI250X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile 's Advantages
Lower TDP (80W vs 500W)
Radeon Instinct MI250X 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 23% (1700MHz vs 1380MHz)
More VRAM (128GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3277GB/s vs 336.0GB/s)
12160 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile
5299
Radeon Instinct MI250X
+803%
47870
Graphics Card
May 2019
Release Date
Nov 2021
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Radeon Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
945 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
1380 MHz
Boost Clock
1700 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1600 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
128GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM2e
192bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
336.0GB/s
Bandwidth
3277GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
220
30
SM Count
-
1920
Shading Units
14080
120
TMUs
880
64
ROPs
0
240
Tensor Cores
-
30
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
3 MB
L2 Cache
16 MB
Theoretical Performance
88.32 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
165.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1496 GTexel/s
10.60 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
383.0 TFLOPS
5.299 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
47.87 TFLOPS
165.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
47.87 TFLOPS
Board Design
80W
TDP
500W
-
Suggested PSU
900 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
TU106
GPU Name
Aldebaran
N19E-Q1-KA-K1
GPU Variant
Aldebaran XT
Turing
Architecture
CDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
6 nm
10.8 billion
Transistors
58.2 billion
445 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
N/A
