Quadro P620 Mobile vs Quadro FX 880M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro P620 Mobile and 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 880M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro P620 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1443MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.13GB/s vs 25.28GB/s)
464 additional rendering cores
Quadro FX 880M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 40W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro P620 Mobile
+1174%
1478
Quadro FX 880M
116
Graphics Card
Feb 2018
Release Date
Jan 2010
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
Clock Speeds
1177 MHz
Base Clock
-
1443 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
790 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
96.13GB/s
Bandwidth
25.28GB/s
Render Config
4
SM Count
6
512
Shading Units
48
32
TMUs
16
16
ROPs
8
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
Theoretical Performance
23.09 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.400 GPixel/s
46.18 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
8.800 GTexel/s
23.09 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1478 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
116.2 GFLOPS
46.18 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
40W
TDP
35W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GP107
GPU Name
GT216
-
GPU Variant
N10P-GLM
Pascal
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
40 nm
3.3 billion
Transistors
0.486 billion
132 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
1.2
6.4
Shader Model
4.1
