Quadro P600 vs Tesla C2090
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro P600 and 6GB VRAM Tesla C2090 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro P600 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1557MHz
Lower TDP (40W vs 250W)
Tesla C2090 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (177.4GB/s vs 64.13GB/s)
128 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro P600
1196
Tesla C2090
+11%
1332
Graphics Card
Feb 2017
Release Date
Jul 2011
Quadro
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1329 MHz
Base Clock
-
1557 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1002 MHz
Memory Clock
924 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
64.13GB/s
Bandwidth
177.4GB/s
Render Config
3
SM Count
16
384
Shading Units
512
24
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
48
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
Theoretical Performance
24.91 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.83 GPixel/s
37.37 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.66 GTexel/s
18.68 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1196 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1332 GFLOPS
37.37 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
666.1 GFLOPS
Board Design
40W
TDP
250W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GP107
GPU Name
GF110
Pascal
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
40 nm
3.3 billion
Transistors
3 billion
132 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
2.0
6.4
Shader Model
5.1
