Quadro P600 vs Quadro K5000 SYNC
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro P600 and 4GB VRAM Quadro K5000 SYNC to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro P600 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1557MHz
Lower TDP (40W vs 122W)
Quadro K5000 SYNC 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (172.8GB/s vs 64.13GB/s)
1152 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro P600
1196
Quadro K5000 SYNC
+81%
2169
Graphics Card
Feb 2017
Release Date
Jan 2013
Quadro
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1329 MHz
Base Clock
-
1557 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1002 MHz
Memory Clock
1350 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
64.13GB/s
Bandwidth
172.8GB/s
Render Config
3
SM Count
-
384
Shading Units
1536
24
TMUs
128
16
ROPs
32
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
Theoretical Performance
24.91 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
22.59 GPixel/s
37.37 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
90.37 GTexel/s
18.68 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1196 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.169 TFLOPS
37.37 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
90.37 GFLOPS
Board Design
40W
TDP
122W
200 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
1x SDI
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GP107
GPU Name
GK104
Pascal
Architecture
Kepler
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.3 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
132 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
6.1
CUDA
3.0
6.4
Shader Model
5.1
