Quadro P600 Mobile vs Quadro K5200
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro P600 Mobile and 8GB VRAM Quadro K5200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro P600 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 110% (1620MHz vs 771MHz)
Lower TDP (40W vs 150W)
Quadro K5200 's Advantages
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 80.13GB/s)
1920 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro P600 Mobile
1244
Quadro K5200
+185%
3553
3DMark Time Spy
Quadro P600 Mobile
1174
Quadro K5200
+76%
2072
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
Quadro P600 Mobile
559
Quadro K5200
+68%
941
Graphics Card
Feb 2017
Release Date
Jul 2014
Quadro Pascal-M
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1430 MHz
Base Clock
667 MHz
1620 MHz
Boost Clock
771 MHz
1252 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
80.13GB/s
Bandwidth
192.3GB/s
Render Config
3
SM Count
-
384
Shading Units
2304
24
TMUs
192
16
ROPs
48
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
25.92 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
37.01 GPixel/s
38.88 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
148.0 GTexel/s
19.44 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1244 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.553 TFLOPS
38.88 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
148.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
40W
TDP
150W
-
Suggested PSU
450 W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
2x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GP107
GPU Name
GK110B
Pascal
Architecture
Kepler
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.3 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
132 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
6.1
CUDA
3.5
6.7
Shader Model
5.1
