Quadro P5200 Max Q vs Quadro M3000M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Quadro P5200 Max Q and 4GB VRAM Quadro M3000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro P5200 Max Q 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1569MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (230.9GB/s vs 160.4GB/s)
1536 additional rendering cores
Quadro M3000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 100W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro P5200 Max Q
+273%
8033
Quadro M3000M
2150
Graphics Card
Feb 2018
Release Date
Aug 2015
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1316 MHz
Base Clock
-
1569 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1804 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
230.9GB/s
Bandwidth
160.4GB/s
Render Config
20
SM Count
-
2560
Shading Units
1024
160
TMUs
64
64
ROPs
32
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
Theoretical Performance
100.4 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
33.60 GPixel/s
251.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
67.20 GTexel/s
125.5 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.033 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.150 TFLOPS
251.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
67.20 GFLOPS
Board Design
100W
TDP
75W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GP104
GPU Name
GM204
-
GPU Variant
N16E-Q1-A1
Pascal
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
28 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
5.2 billion
314 mm²
Die Size
398 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
5.2
6.4
Shader Model
6.4
