Quadro P5000 vs Tesla C2090
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Quadro P5000 and 6GB VRAM Tesla C2090 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro P5000 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1733MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.5GB/s vs 177.4GB/s)
2048 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (180W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro P5000
+566%
8873
Tesla C2090
1332
Graphics Card
Oct 2016
Release Date
Jul 2011
Quadro
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1607 MHz
Base Clock
-
1733 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1127 MHz
Memory Clock
924 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5X
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
288.5GB/s
Bandwidth
177.4GB/s
Render Config
20
SM Count
16
2560
Shading Units
512
160
TMUs
64
64
ROPs
48
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
768 KB
Theoretical Performance
110.9 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.83 GPixel/s
277.3 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.66 GTexel/s
138.6 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.873 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1332 GFLOPS
277.3 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
666.1 GFLOPS
Board Design
180W
TDP
250W
450 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GP104
GPU Name
GF110
GP104-875-A1
GPU Variant
-
Pascal
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
40 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
3 billion
314 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
2.0
6.4
Shader Model
5.1
