Quadro P5000 vs Tesla C2075
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Quadro P5000 and 6GB VRAM Tesla C2075 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro P5000 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1733MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.5GB/s vs 150.3GB/s)
2112 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (180W vs 247W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro P5000
+763%
8873
Tesla C2075
1028
Graphics Card
Oct 2016
Release Date
Jul 2011
Quadro
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1607 MHz
Base Clock
-
1733 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1127 MHz
Memory Clock
783 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5X
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
288.5GB/s
Bandwidth
150.3GB/s
Render Config
20
SM Count
14
2560
Shading Units
448
160
TMUs
56
64
ROPs
48
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
768 KB
Theoretical Performance
110.9 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.07 GPixel/s
277.3 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.14 GTexel/s
138.6 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.873 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1028 GFLOPS
277.3 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
513.9 GFLOPS
Board Design
180W
TDP
247W
450 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GP104
GPU Name
GF110
GP104-875-A1
GPU Variant
GF110-351-A1
Pascal
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
40 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
3 billion
314 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
2.0
6.4
Shader Model
5.1
