Quadro P5000 vs GRID K2
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Quadro P5000 and 4GB VRAM GRID K2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro P5000 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1733MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.5GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (180W vs 225W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro P5000
+287%
8873
GRID K2
2289
Graphics Card
Oct 2016
Release Date
May 2013
Quadro
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1607 MHz
Base Clock
-
1733 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1127 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5X
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
288.5GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s
Render Config
20
SM Count
-
2560
Shading Units
1536
160
TMUs
128
64
ROPs
32
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
2 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
Theoretical Performance
110.9 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.84 GPixel/s
277.3 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
95.36 GTexel/s
138.6 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.873 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.289 TFLOPS
277.3 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
95.36 GFLOPS
Board Design
180W
TDP
225W
450 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GP104
GPU Name
GK104
GP104-875-A1
GPU Variant
GK104-895-A2
Pascal
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
28 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
314 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2.175
6.1
CUDA
3.0
6.4
Shader Model
6.5 (5.1)
