Quadro P4000 vs GRID K260Q
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro P4000 and 2GB VRAM GRID K260Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro P4000 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1480MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (243.3GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (105W vs 225W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro P4000
+131%
5304
GRID K260Q
2289
Graphics Card
Feb 2017
Release Date
Jun 2013
Quadro
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1202 MHz
Base Clock
-
1480 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1901 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
243.3GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s
Render Config
14
SM Count
-
1792
Shading Units
1536
112
TMUs
128
64
ROPs
32
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
2 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
Theoretical Performance
94.72 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.84 GPixel/s
165.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
95.36 GTexel/s
82.88 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.304 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.289 TFLOPS
165.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
95.36 GFLOPS
Board Design
105W
TDP
225W
300 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GP104
GPU Name
GK104
GP104-850-A1
GPU Variant
-
Pascal
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
28 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
314 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
6.1
CUDA
3.0
6.4
Shader Model
5.1
