Quadro P2000 vs Quadro M500M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 5GB VRAM Quadro P2000 and 2GB VRAM Quadro M500M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro P2000 's Advantages
Released 10 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 32% (1480MHz vs 1124MHz)
More VRAM (5GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (140.2GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
640 additional rendering cores
Quadro M500M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (30W vs 75W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro P2000
+251%
3031
Quadro M500M
863
Graphics Card
Feb 2017
Release Date
Apr 2016
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
Clock Speeds
1076 MHz
Base Clock
1029 MHz
1480 MHz
Boost Clock
1124 MHz
1752 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
5GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
160bit
Memory Bus
64bit
140.2GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s
Render Config
8
SM Count
-
1024
Shading Units
384
64
TMUs
16
40
ROPs
8
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
1280 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
Theoretical Performance
59.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.992 GPixel/s
94.72 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
17.98 GTexel/s
47.36 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.031 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
863.2 GFLOPS
94.72 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
26.98 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
30W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GP106
GPU Name
GM108
GP106-875-A1
GPU Variant
N15M-Q3
Pascal
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.4 billion
Transistors
Unknown
200 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
5.0
6.4
Shader Model
5.1
