Quadro P2000 vs Quadro K2000
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 5GB VRAM Quadro P2000 and 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro P2000 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1480MHz
More VRAM (5GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (140.2GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
640 additional rendering cores
Quadro K2000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (51W vs 75W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro P2000
+313%
3031
Quadro K2000
733
Graphics Card
Feb 2017
Release Date
Mar 2013
Quadro
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1076 MHz
Base Clock
-
1480 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1752 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
5GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
160bit
Memory Bus
128bit
140.2GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s
Render Config
8
SM Count
-
1024
Shading Units
384
64
TMUs
32
40
ROPs
16
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
1280 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
59.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.632 GPixel/s
94.72 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.53 GTexel/s
47.36 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.031 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
732.7 GFLOPS
94.72 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
30.53 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
51W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GP106
GPU Name
GK107
GP106-875-A1
GPU Variant
GK107-301-A2
Pascal
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.4 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
6.1
CUDA
3.0
6.4
Shader Model
5.1
