Quadro P2000 Mobile vs Quadro M2000M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 0GB VRAM Quadro P2000 Mobile and 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro P2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 18% (1291MHz vs 1098MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.13GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
Quadro M2000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (55W vs 75W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro P2000 Mobile
+111%
2974
Quadro M2000M
1405
3DMark Time Spy
Quadro P2000 Mobile
+77%
2096
Quadro M2000M
1180
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
Quadro P2000 Mobile
+212%
1723
Quadro M2000M
552
Blender
Quadro P2000 Mobile
+75%
231
Quadro M2000M
132
OctaneBench
Quadro P2000 Mobile
+58%
54
Quadro M2000M
34
Graphics Card
Feb 2019
Release Date
Dec 2015
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
Clock Speeds
1291 MHz
Base Clock
1029 MHz
1291 MHz
Boost Clock
1098 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz
Memory
GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
96.13GB/s
Bandwidth
80.19GB/s
Render Config
9
SM Count
-
1152
Shading Units
640
72
TMUs
40
32
ROPs
16
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
1280 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
Theoretical Performance
41.31 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.57 GPixel/s
92.95 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
43.92 GTexel/s
46.48 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.974 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1405 GFLOPS
92.95 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
43.92 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
55W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GP106
GPU Name
GM107
-
GPU Variant
N16P-Q3-A2
Pascal
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.4 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
5.0
6.4
Shader Model
5.1
