Quadro NVS 450 vs RTX A2000 Embedded
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 450 and 8GB VRAM RTX A2000 Embedded to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro NVS 450 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 60W)
RTX A2000 Embedded 's Advantages
Boost Clock1612MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 11.20GB/s)
2552 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro NVS 450
19
RTX A2000 Embedded
+43336%
8253
Graphics Card
Nov 2008
Release Date
Unknown
Quadro NVS
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1117 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1612 MHz
700 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
11.20GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s
Render Config
1
SM Count
20
8
Shading Units
2560
4
TMUs
80
4
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
80
-
RT Cores
20
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
16 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
Theoretical Performance
1.920 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
77.38 GPixel/s
1.920 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
129.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.253 TFLOPS
19.20 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.253 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
129.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
35W
TDP
60W
200 W
Suggested PSU
-
4x DisplayPort
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
G98
GPU Name
GA107S
G98-875-U2
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Ampere
UMC
Foundry
Samsung
55 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
Unknown
80 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
8.6
4.0
Shader Model
6.6
