Home Comparison Quadro NVS 450 vs Data Center GPU Flex 140

Quadro NVS 450 vs Data Center GPU Flex 140

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 450 and 6GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 140 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Quadro NVS 450 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 75W)
Data Center GPU Flex 140 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1950MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (186.0GB/s vs 11.20GB/s)
1016 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro NVS 450
19
Data Center GPU Flex 140 +20921%
3994

Graphics Card

Nov 2008
Release Date
Aug 2022
Quadro NVS
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1600 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1950 MHz
700 MHz
Memory Clock
1937 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
96bit
11.20GB/s
Bandwidth
186.0GB/s

Render Config

1
SM Count
-
8
Shading Units
1024
4
TMUs
64
4
ROPs
32
-
RT Cores
8
16 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB

Theoretical Performance

1.920 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
62.40 GPixel/s
1.920 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
124.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
7.987 TFLOPS
19.20 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.994 TFLOPS

Board Design

35W
TDP
75W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x DisplayPort
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 2.0
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

G98
GPU Name
DG2-128
G98-875-U2
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
Tesla
Architecture
Generation 12.7
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
80 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.6
© 2025 - TopCPU.net