Quadro NVS 290 vs RTX A4500 Embedded
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 290 and 16GB VRAM RTX A4500 Embedded to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro NVS 290 's Advantages
Lower TDP (21W vs 80W)
RTX A4500 Embedded 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1215MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (384.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
5872 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro NVS 290
29
RTX A4500 Embedded
+49244%
14310
Graphics Card
Oct 2007
Release Date
Mar 2022
Quadro NVS
Generation
Quadro Ampere-M
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
510 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1215 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
384.0GB/s
Render Config
2
SM Count
46
16
Shading Units
5888
8
TMUs
184
4
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
184
-
RT Cores
46
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
16 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
Theoretical Performance
1.836 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
116.6 GPixel/s
3.672 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
223.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
14.31 TFLOPS
29.38 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.31 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
223.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
21W
TDP
80W
200 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DMS-59
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
G86
GPU Name
GA104
Tesla
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
80 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
17.4 billion
127 mm²
Die Size
392 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
8.6
4.0
Shader Model
6.7
