Quadro NVS 290 vs Quadro P5200 Max Q
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 290 and 16GB VRAM Quadro P5200 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro NVS 290 's Advantages
Lower TDP (21W vs 100W)
Quadro P5200 Max Q 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1569MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (230.9GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
2544 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro NVS 290
29
Quadro P5200 Max Q
+27600%
8033
Graphics Card
Oct 2007
Release Date
Feb 2018
Quadro NVS
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1316 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1569 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1804 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
230.9GB/s
Render Config
2
SM Count
20
16
Shading Units
2560
8
TMUs
160
4
ROPs
64
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
16 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
Theoretical Performance
1.836 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
100.4 GPixel/s
3.672 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
251.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
125.5 GFLOPS
29.38 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.033 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
251.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
21W
TDP
100W
200 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DMS-59
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
G86
GPU Name
GP104
Tesla
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
16 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
127 mm²
Die Size
314 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
6.1
4.0
Shader Model
6.4
