Home Comparison Quadro NVS 130M vs Quadro K5200

Quadro NVS 130M vs Quadro K5200

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 130M and 8GB VRAM Quadro K5200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Quadro NVS 130M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (10W vs 150W)
Quadro K5200 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock771MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 11.20GB/s)
2296 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro NVS 130M
13
Quadro K5200 +27230%
3553

Graphics Card

May 2007
Release Date
Jul 2014
NVS Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
667 MHz
-
Boost Clock
771 MHz
700 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
8GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
11.20GB/s
Bandwidth
192.3GB/s

Render Config

1
SM Count
-
8
Shading Units
2304
8
TMUs
192
4
ROPs
48
16 KB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

1.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
37.01 GPixel/s
3.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
148.0 GTexel/s
12.80 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.553 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
148.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

10W
TDP
150W
-
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

G86
GPU Name
GK110B
G86-613-A2
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
127 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
1.1
CUDA
3.5
4.0
Shader Model
5.1
© 2025 - TopCPU.net