Quadro M600M vs Quadro T2000 Max Q
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro M600M and 4GB VRAM Quadro T2000 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro M600M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (30W vs 40W)
Quadro T2000 Max Q 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 85% (1620MHz vs 876MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (112.1GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
640 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro M600M
673
Quadro T2000 Max Q
+393%
3318
3DMark Time Spy
Quadro M600M
660
Quadro T2000 Max Q
+387%
3220
Graphics Card
Aug 2015
Release Date
May 2019
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
837 MHz
Base Clock
1200 MHz
876 MHz
Boost Clock
1620 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1751 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
112.1GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
16
384
Shading Units
1024
16
TMUs
64
8
ROPs
32
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
Theoretical Performance
7.008 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
51.84 GPixel/s
14.02 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
103.7 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.636 TFLOPS
672.8 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.318 TFLOPS
21.02 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
103.7 GFLOPS
Board Design
30W
TDP
40W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GM107
GPU Name
TU117
Maxwell
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.0
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
