Quadro M600M vs Quadro P5200 Max Q
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro M600M and 16GB VRAM Quadro P5200 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro M600M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (30W vs 100W)
Quadro P5200 Max Q 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 79% (1569MHz vs 876MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (230.9GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
2176 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro M600M
673
Quadro P5200 Max Q
+1093%
8033
Graphics Card
Aug 2015
Release Date
Feb 2018
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
837 MHz
Base Clock
1316 MHz
876 MHz
Boost Clock
1569 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1804 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
230.9GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
20
384
Shading Units
2560
16
TMUs
160
8
ROPs
64
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
Theoretical Performance
7.008 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
100.4 GPixel/s
14.02 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
251.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
125.5 GFLOPS
672.8 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.033 TFLOPS
21.02 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
251.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
30W
TDP
100W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GM107
GPU Name
GP104
Maxwell
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
16 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
314 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.0
CUDA
6.1
5.1
Shader Model
6.4
