Quadro M600M vs Quadro P2000 Mobile
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro M600M and 0GB VRAM Quadro P2000 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro M600M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (30W vs 75W)
Quadro P2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 47% (1291MHz vs 876MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.13GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro M600M
673
Quadro P2000 Mobile
+341%
2974
3DMark Time Spy
Quadro M600M
660
Quadro P2000 Mobile
+217%
2096
Graphics Card
Aug 2015
Release Date
Feb 2019
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
837 MHz
Base Clock
1291 MHz
876 MHz
Boost Clock
1291 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
96.13GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
9
384
Shading Units
1152
16
TMUs
72
8
ROPs
32
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
1280 KB
Theoretical Performance
7.008 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
41.31 GPixel/s
14.02 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
92.95 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
46.48 GFLOPS
672.8 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.974 TFLOPS
21.02 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
92.95 GFLOPS
Board Design
30W
TDP
75W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GM107
GPU Name
GP106
Maxwell
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
16 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
4.4 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.0
CUDA
6.1
5.1
Shader Model
6.4
