Quadro M600M vs Quadro K5200
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro M600M and 8GB VRAM Quadro K5200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro M600M 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 14% (876MHz vs 771MHz)
Lower TDP (30W vs 150W)
Quadro K5200 's Advantages
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
1920 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro M600M
673
Quadro K5200
+427%
3553
3DMark Time Spy
Quadro M600M
660
Quadro K5200
+213%
2072
Graphics Card
Aug 2015
Release Date
Jul 2014
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
837 MHz
Base Clock
667 MHz
876 MHz
Boost Clock
771 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
192.3GB/s
Render Config
384
Shading Units
2304
16
TMUs
192
8
ROPs
48
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
7.008 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
37.01 GPixel/s
14.02 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
148.0 GTexel/s
672.8 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.553 TFLOPS
21.02 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
148.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
30W
TDP
150W
-
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GM107
GPU Name
GK110B
Maxwell
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
5.0
CUDA
3.5
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
