Quadro M600M vs Quadro FX 1600M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro M600M and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1600M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro M600M 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock876MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.19GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
352 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (30W vs 50W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro M600M
+741%
673
Quadro FX 1600M
80
Graphics Card
Aug 2015
Release Date
Jun 2007
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
MXM-HE
Clock Speeds
837 MHz
Base Clock
-
876 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
4
384
Shading Units
32
16
TMUs
16
8
ROPs
8
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
Theoretical Performance
7.008 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.000 GPixel/s
14.02 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
10.00 GTexel/s
672.8 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
80.00 GFLOPS
21.02 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
30W
TDP
50W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GM107
GPU Name
G84
-
GPU Variant
NB8P-GLM
Maxwell
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
80 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
0.289 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
169 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.0
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0
