Home Comparison Quadro M500M vs Data Center GPU Max 1100

Quadro M500M vs Data Center GPU Max 1100

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro M500M and 48GB VRAM Data Center GPU Max 1100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Quadro M500M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (30W vs 300W)
Data Center GPU Max 1100 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 38% (1550MHz vs 1124MHz)
More VRAM (48GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
6784 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M500M
863
Data Center GPU Max 1100 +2474%
22220

Graphics Card

Apr 2016
Release Date
Jan 2023
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1029 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
1124 MHz
Boost Clock
1550 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
600 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
48GB
DDR3
Memory Type
HBM2e
64bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s

Render Config

384
Shading Units
7168
16
TMUs
448
8
ROPs
0
-
Tensor Cores
448
-
RT Cores
56
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per EU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
204 MB

Theoretical Performance

8.992 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
17.98 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
694.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
22.22 TFLOPS
863.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
22.22 TFLOPS
26.98 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
22.22 TFLOPS

Board Design

30W
TDP
300W
-
Suggested PSU
700 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 12-pin

Graphics Processor

GM108
GPU Name
Ponte Vecchio
N15M-Q3
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
28 nm
Process Size
10 nm
Unknown
Transistors
100 billion
Unknown
Die Size
1280 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
© 2025 - TopCPU.net