Home Comparison Quadro M2000M vs RTX A5500 Max Q

Quadro M2000M vs RTX A5500 Max Q

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000M and 16GB VRAM RTX A5500 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Quadro M2000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (55W vs 80W)
RTX A5500 Max Q 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 15% (1260MHz vs 1098MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
6784 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M2000M
1405
RTX A5500 Max Q +1231%
18710

Graphics Card

Dec 2015
Release Date
Mar 2022
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Ampere-MW
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1029 MHz
Base Clock
585 MHz
1098 MHz
Boost Clock
1260 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
58
640
Shading Units
7424
40
TMUs
232
16
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
232
-
RT Cores
58
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB

Theoretical Performance

17.57 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
121.0 GPixel/s
43.92 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
292.3 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
18.71 TFLOPS
1405 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
18.71 TFLOPS
43.92 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
292.3 GFLOPS

Board Design

55W
TDP
80W
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
GA103
N16P-Q3-A2
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
22 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
496 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.0
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.8
© 2025 - TopCPU.net