Quadro M2000M vs Quadro M5000
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000M and 8GB VRAM Quadro M5000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro M2000M 's Advantages
Released 6 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 6% (1098MHz vs 1038MHz)
Lower TDP (55W vs 150W)
Quadro M5000 's Advantages
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (211.6GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
1408 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro M2000M
1405
Quadro M5000
+202%
4252
3DMark Time Spy
Quadro M2000M
1180
Quadro M5000
+211%
3675
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
Quadro M2000M
552
Quadro M5000
+206%
1692
Blender
Quadro M2000M
132
Quadro M5000
+151%
332
OctaneBench
Quadro M2000M
34
Quadro M5000
+155%
87
Graphics Card
Dec 2015
Release Date
Jun 2015
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1029 MHz
Base Clock
861 MHz
1098 MHz
Boost Clock
1038 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1653 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
211.6GB/s
Render Config
640
Shading Units
2048
40
TMUs
128
16
ROPs
64
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
Theoretical Performance
17.57 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
66.43 GPixel/s
43.92 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
132.9 GTexel/s
1405 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.252 TFLOPS
43.92 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
132.9 GFLOPS
Board Design
55W
TDP
150W
-
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GM107
GPU Name
GM204
N16P-Q3-A2
GPU Variant
GM204-875-A1
Maxwell
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
5.2 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
398 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.0
CUDA
5.2
5.1
Shader Model
6.4
