Quadro M2000M vs Quadro K2000D
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000M and 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000D to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro M2000M 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1098MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.19GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores
Quadro K2000D 's Advantages
Lower TDP (51W vs 55W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro M2000M
+91%
1405
Quadro K2000D
733
Graphics Card
Dec 2015
Release Date
Mar 2013
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1029 MHz
Base Clock
-
1098 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s
Render Config
640
Shading Units
384
40
TMUs
32
16
ROPs
16
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
2 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
17.57 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.632 GPixel/s
43.92 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.53 GTexel/s
1405 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
732.7 GFLOPS
43.92 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
30.53 GFLOPS
Board Design
55W
TDP
51W
-
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI
1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GM107
GPU Name
GK107
N16P-Q3-A2
GPU Variant
GK107-301-A2
Maxwell
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
5.0
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
