Quadro M2000M vs Quadro CX
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000M and 1536MB VRAM Quadro CX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro M2000M 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1098MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1536GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.19GB/s vs 76.80GB/s)
448 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (55W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro M2000M
+204%
1405
Quadro CX
462
Graphics Card
Dec 2015
Release Date
Nov 2008
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro CX
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1029 MHz
Base Clock
-
1098 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
1536MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
76.80GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
24
640
Shading Units
192
40
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
24
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
192 KB
Theoretical Performance
17.57 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.45 GPixel/s
43.92 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
38.53 GTexel/s
1405 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
462.3 GFLOPS
43.92 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
57.79 GFLOPS
Board Design
55W
TDP
150W
-
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort
1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GM107
GPU Name
GT200B
N16P-Q3-A2
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.0
CUDA
1.3
5.1
Shader Model
4.0
