Quadro M2000M vs GRID RTX T10 16
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000M and 16GB VRAM GRID RTX T10 16 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro M2000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (55W vs 150W)
GRID RTX T10 16 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 27% (1395MHz vs 1098MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (604.8GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
2944 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro M2000M
1405
GRID RTX T10 16
+611%
9999
Graphics Card
Dec 2015
Release Date
Unknown
Quadro Mobile
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1029 MHz
Base Clock
1065 MHz
1098 MHz
Boost Clock
1395 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1575 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
604.8GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
56
640
Shading Units
3584
40
TMUs
224
16
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
448
-
RT Cores
56
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
6 MB
Theoretical Performance
17.57 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
89.28 GPixel/s
43.92 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
312.5 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
20.00 TFLOPS
1405 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
9.999 TFLOPS
43.92 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
312.5 GFLOPS
Board Design
55W
TDP
150W
-
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GM107
GPU Name
TU102
N16P-Q3-A2
GPU Variant
TU102-875-A1
Maxwell
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
18.6 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
754 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.0
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.8
