Quadro M2000M vs AMD Instinct MI300A
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000M and 128GB VRAM AMD Instinct MI300A to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro M2000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (55W vs 760W)
AMD Instinct MI300A 's Advantages
Released 8 years late
Boost Clock has increased by 91% (2100MHz vs 1098MHz)
More VRAM (128GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (5300GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
13952 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro M2000M
1405
AMD Instinct MI300A
+8625%
122600
Graphics Card
Dec 2015
Release Date
Dec 2023
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1029 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
1098 MHz
Boost Clock
2100 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
5200 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
128GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM3
128bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
5300GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
228
640
Shading Units
14592
40
TMUs
880
16
ROPs
0
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
16 MB
Theoretical Performance
17.57 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
43.92 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1496 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
980.6 TFLOPS
1405 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
122.6 TFLOPS
43.92 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
61.3 TFLOPS
Board Design
55W
TDP
760W
-
Suggested PSU
1000 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GM107
GPU Name
MI300
N16P-Q3-A2
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell
Architecture
CDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
146 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
1017 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
N/A
