Quadro M2000 vs RTX A2000 Mobile
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000 and 4GB VRAM RTX A2000 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro M2000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 95W)
RTX A2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 5 years late
Boost Clock has increased by 45% (1687MHz vs 1163MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 105.8GB/s)
1792 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro M2000
1786
RTX A2000 Mobile
+383%
8637
3DMark Time Spy
Quadro M2000
1544
RTX A2000 Mobile
+218%
4917
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
Quadro M2000
690
RTX A2000 Mobile
+311%
2836
Blender
Quadro M2000
145
RTX A2000 Mobile
+742%
1222
OctaneBench
Quadro M2000
28
RTX A2000 Mobile
+200%
84
Graphics Card
Apr 2016
Release Date
Apr 2021
Quadro
Generation
Ampere-MW
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
796 MHz
Base Clock
1215 MHz
1163 MHz
Boost Clock
1687 MHz
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
105.8GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
20
768
Shading Units
2560
48
TMUs
80
32
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
80
-
RT Cores
20
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
Theoretical Performance
37.22 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
80.98 GPixel/s
55.82 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
135.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.637 TFLOPS
1.786 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.637 TFLOPS
55.82 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
135.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
95W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GM206
GPU Name
GA107
GM206-875-A1
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
8.7 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.2
CUDA
8.6
6.4
Shader Model
6.8
