Quadro M2000 vs Quadro K2000D
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000 and 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000D to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro M2000 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1163MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (105.8GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores
Quadro K2000D 's Advantages
Lower TDP (51W vs 75W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro M2000
+143%
1786
Quadro K2000D
733
Graphics Card
Apr 2016
Release Date
Mar 2013
Quadro
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
796 MHz
Base Clock
-
1163 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
105.8GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s
Render Config
768
Shading Units
384
48
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
16
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
37.22 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.632 GPixel/s
55.82 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.53 GTexel/s
1.786 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
732.7 GFLOPS
55.82 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
30.53 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
51W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI
1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GM206
GPU Name
GK107
GM206-875-A1
GPU Variant
GK107-301-A2
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
5.2
CUDA
3.0
6.4
Shader Model
5.1
