Quadro M2000 vs Quadro CX
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000 and 1536MB VRAM Quadro CX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro M2000 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1163MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1536GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (105.8GB/s vs 76.80GB/s)
576 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro M2000
+286%
1786
Quadro CX
462
Graphics Card
Apr 2016
Release Date
Nov 2008
Quadro
Generation
Quadro CX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
796 MHz
Base Clock
-
1163 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
1536MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
105.8GB/s
Bandwidth
76.80GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
24
768
Shading Units
192
48
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
24
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
192 KB
Theoretical Performance
37.22 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.45 GPixel/s
55.82 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
38.53 GTexel/s
1.786 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
462.3 GFLOPS
55.82 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
57.79 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
150W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort
1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GM206
GPU Name
GT200B
GM206-875-A1
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.2
CUDA
1.3
6.4
Shader Model
4.0
