Quadro K500M vs Quadro K5200
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro K500M and 8GB VRAM Quadro K5200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro K500M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 150W)
Quadro K5200 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock771MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
2112 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K500M
326
Quadro K5200
+989%
3553
Graphics Card
Jun 2012
Release Date
Jul 2014
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
667 MHz
-
Boost Clock
771 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
8GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
192.3GB/s
Render Config
192
Shading Units
2304
16
TMUs
192
8
ROPs
48
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
128 KB
L2 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
3.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
37.01 GPixel/s
13.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
148.0 GTexel/s
326.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.553 TFLOPS
13.60 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
148.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
35W
TDP
150W
-
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GK107
GPU Name
GK110B
N14M-Q1
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.1
3.0
CUDA
3.5
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
