Quadro K5000 SYNC vs Quadro M6000
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K5000 SYNC and 12GB VRAM Quadro M6000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro K5000 SYNC 's Advantages
Lower TDP (122W vs 250W)
Quadro M6000 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1114MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (317.4GB/s vs 172.8GB/s)
1536 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K5000 SYNC
2169
Quadro M6000
+215%
6844
Graphics Card
Jan 2013
Release Date
Mar 2015
Quadro
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
988 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1114 MHz
1350 MHz
Memory Clock
1653 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
12GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
172.8GB/s
Bandwidth
317.4GB/s
Render Config
1536
Shading Units
3072
128
TMUs
192
32
ROPs
96
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
3 MB
Theoretical Performance
22.59 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
106.9 GPixel/s
90.37 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
213.9 GTexel/s
2.169 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
6.844 TFLOPS
90.37 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
213.9 GFLOPS
Board Design
122W
TDP
250W
300 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
1x SDI
Outputs
1x DVI
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GK104
GPU Name
GM200
Kepler
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
8 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
601 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
5.2
5.1
Shader Model
6.4
