Quadro K5000 SYNC vs Arctic Sound M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K5000 SYNC and 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro K5000 SYNC 's Advantages
Lower TDP (122W vs 500W)
Arctic Sound M 's Advantages
Released 9 years late
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 172.8GB/s)
6656 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K5000 SYNC
2169
Arctic Sound M
+580%
14750
Graphics Card
Jan 2013
Release Date
Jan 2022
Quadro
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1350 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
256bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
172.8GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s
Render Config
1536
Shading Units
8192
128
TMUs
256
32
ROPs
128
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
8 MB
Theoretical Performance
22.59 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
115.2 GPixel/s
90.37 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
230.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
29.49 TFLOPS
2.169 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.75 TFLOPS
90.37 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
3.686 TFLOPS
Board Design
122W
TDP
500W
300 W
Suggested PSU
900 W
2x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
1x SDI
Outputs
No outputs
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS
Graphics Processor
GK104
GPU Name
Arctic Sound
Kepler
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
28 nm
Process Size
10 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
8 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
190 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
