Quadro K2200 vs GRID M6 8Q
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K2200 and 8GB VRAM GRID M6 8Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro K2200 's Advantages
Boost Clock1124MHz
Lower TDP (68W vs 100W)
GRID M6 8Q 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 1 months late
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.4GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
896 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K2200
1439
GRID M6 8Q
+54%
2218
Graphics Card
Jul 2014
Release Date
Aug 2015
Quadro
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1046 MHz
Base Clock
-
1124 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
160.4GB/s
Render Config
640
Shading Units
1536
40
TMUs
96
16
ROPs
64
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
Theoretical Performance
17.98 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
46.21 GPixel/s
44.96 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
69.31 GTexel/s
1439 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.218 TFLOPS
44.96 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
69.31 GFLOPS
Board Design
68W
TDP
100W
250 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GM107
GPU Name
GM204
-
GPU Variant
GM204-995-A1
Maxwell
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
5.2 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
398 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.0
CUDA
5.2
5.1
Shader Model
6.4
