Home Comparison Quadro K2200 vs GRID K220Q

Quadro K2200 vs GRID K220Q

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K2200 and 512MB VRAM GRID K220Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Quadro K2200 's Advantages
Boost Clock1124MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Lower TDP (68W vs 225W)
GRID K220Q 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
896 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K2200
1439
GRID K220Q +59%
2289
Blender
Quadro K2200
127
GRID K220Q +32%
168

Graphics Card

Jul 2014
Release Date
Jul 2014
Quadro
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1046 MHz
Base Clock
-
1124 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

640
Shading Units
1536
40
TMUs
128
16
ROPs
32
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
2 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

17.98 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.84 GPixel/s
44.96 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
95.36 GTexel/s
1439 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.289 TFLOPS
44.96 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
95.36 GFLOPS

Board Design

68W
TDP
225W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
GK104
Maxwell
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
5.0
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
© 2025 - TopCPU.net