Quadro K200M vs Tesla K20c
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro K200M and 5GB VRAM Tesla K20c to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro K200M 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 9 months late
Lower TDP (35W vs 225W)
Tesla K20c 's Advantages
More VRAM (5GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (208.0GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
2304 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K200M
326
Tesla K20c
+980%
3524
Graphics Card
Aug 2014
Release Date
Nov 2012
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1300 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
5GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
320bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
208.0GB/s
Render Config
192
Shading Units
2496
16
TMUs
208
8
ROPs
40
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
128 KB
L2 Cache
1280 KB
Theoretical Performance
3.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
36.71 GPixel/s
13.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
146.8 GTexel/s
326.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.524 TFLOPS
13.60 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1175 GFLOPS
Board Design
35W
TDP
225W
-
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GK107
GPU Name
GK110
N14M-Q1
GPU Variant
GK110-885-KA-A1
Kepler
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.1
3.0
CUDA
3.5
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
