Quadro K200M vs GRID K340
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro K200M and 1024MB VRAM GRID K340 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro K200M 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 1 months late
Lower TDP (35W vs 225W)
GRID K340 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.00GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
192 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K200M
326
GRID K340
+124%
733
Graphics Card
Aug 2014
Release Date
Jul 2013
Quadro Mobile
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
1024MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
80.00GB/s
Render Config
192
Shading Units
384
16
TMUs
32
8
ROPs
16
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
128 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
Theoretical Performance
3.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.632 GPixel/s
13.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.53 GTexel/s
326.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
732.7 GFLOPS
13.60 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
30.53 GFLOPS
Board Design
35W
TDP
225W
-
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GK107
GPU Name
GK107
N14M-Q1
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.1
3.0
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
