Quadro K200M vs GRID K260Q
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro K200M and 2GB VRAM GRID K260Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro K200M 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 2 months late
Lower TDP (35W vs 225W)
GRID K260Q 's Advantages
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
1344 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K200M
326
GRID K260Q
+602%
2289
Graphics Card
Aug 2014
Release Date
Jun 2013
Quadro Mobile
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s
Render Config
192
Shading Units
1536
16
TMUs
128
8
ROPs
32
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
128 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
Theoretical Performance
3.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.84 GPixel/s
13.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
95.36 GTexel/s
326.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.289 TFLOPS
13.60 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
95.36 GFLOPS
Board Design
35W
TDP
225W
-
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
Graphics Processor
GK107
GPU Name
GK104
N14M-Q1
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.1
3.0
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
