Quadro K2000 vs Quadro P5200 Mobile
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000 and 16GB VRAM Quadro P5200 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro K2000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (51W vs 100W)
Quadro P5200 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1747MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (230.9GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
2176 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K2000
733
Quadro P5200 Mobile
+1120%
8945
Graphics Card
Mar 2013
Release Date
Feb 2018
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1557 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1747 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1804 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
230.9GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
20
384
Shading Units
2560
32
TMUs
160
16
ROPs
64
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
Theoretical Performance
7.632 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
111.8 GPixel/s
30.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
279.5 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
139.8 GFLOPS
732.7 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.945 TFLOPS
30.53 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
279.5 GFLOPS
Board Design
51W
TDP
100W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GK107
GPU Name
GP104
GK107-301-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
16 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
314 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
6.1
5.1
Shader Model
6.4
