Quadro K2000 vs Quadro FX 360M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000 and 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 360M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro K2000 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 10 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 9.600GB/s)
368 additional rendering cores
Quadro FX 360M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (17W vs 51W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K2000
+2719%
733
Quadro FX 360M
26
Graphics Card
Mar 2013
Release Date
May 2007
Quadro
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
600 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
9.600GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
2
384
Shading Units
16
32
TMUs
8
16
ROPs
4
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
16 KB
Theoretical Performance
7.632 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.600 GPixel/s
30.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.200 GTexel/s
732.7 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
25.60 GFLOPS
30.53 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
51W
TDP
17W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GK107
GPU Name
G86
GK107-301-A2
GPU Variant
NB8M-GLM
Kepler
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
80 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
127 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0
