Quadro K2000 vs Quadro 2000M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000 and 2GB VRAM Quadro 2000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro K2000 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 2 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
192 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (51W vs 55W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K2000
+73%
733
Quadro 2000M
422
Graphics Card
Mar 2013
Release Date
Jan 2011
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
Clock Speeds
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
4
384
Shading Units
192
32
TMUs
32
16
ROPs
16
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
7.632 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.400 GPixel/s
30.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
17.60 GTexel/s
732.7 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
422.4 GFLOPS
30.53 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
35.20 GFLOPS
Board Design
51W
TDP
55W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GK107
GPU Name
GF106
GK107-301-A2
GPU Variant
N12P-Q3
Kepler
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
1.17 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
238 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
2.1
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
