Quadro FX 880M vs Quadro P5200 Max Q
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 880M and 16GB VRAM Quadro P5200 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro FX 880M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 100W)
Quadro P5200 Max Q 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1569MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (230.9GB/s vs 25.28GB/s)
2512 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 880M
116
Quadro P5200 Max Q
+6825%
8033
Graphics Card
Jan 2010
Release Date
Feb 2018
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1316 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1569 MHz
790 MHz
Memory Clock
1804 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
25.28GB/s
Bandwidth
230.9GB/s
Render Config
6
SM Count
20
48
Shading Units
2560
16
TMUs
160
8
ROPs
64
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
Theoretical Performance
4.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
100.4 GPixel/s
8.800 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
251.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
125.5 GFLOPS
116.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.033 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
251.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
35W
TDP
100W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GT216
GPU Name
GP104
N10P-GLM
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
16 nm
0.486 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
314 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.2
CUDA
6.1
4.1
Shader Model
6.4
